Radioactive Tuna: All About Food, Water and Energy

This week at Ecocentric, we've been following news that Bluefin tuna caught off California’s coast had low levels of cesium-134 and cesium-137 in their systems. The timing of the findings suggests that radioactivity was picked up by tuna swimming in waters off the tsunami-damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan in March 2011. Scientists and the FDA immediately stressed that the tuna are still safe for humans to consume—even raw. Besides, tuna, ocean life and people already have low levels of cesium in their tissues.

Remember the Cold War between the United States and the former Soviet Union after World War II? In the corresponding arms race, the U.S. and other nations detonated thousands of nuclear devices above ground (including our atmosphere) and also eventually underground. Though the practice peaked during the 1950s and 1960s, testing continued for many years as partial and total international test ban treaties were proposed, signed and ratified. (For more on this fascinating, important policy issue and topic, please see the international Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Organization, which is affiliated with, though not a part of the United Nations.) Those tests are the single greatest source of radioactive cesium in the environment. Over time, radioactive isotopes will decay, while the effects of radiation exposure can take decades to manifest in the environment.

Hence the concern for those exposed to fallout from the Fukushima disaster. That tuna swam across the Pacific to California (as tuna are wont to do) further demonstrates connections among populations through food (and water, and in this case, energy) systems. Ahem.

Responses to "Radioactive Tuna: All About Food, Water and Energy"
The views and opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect those of the Ecocentric Blog or GRACE Communications Foundation.

  1. Stephanie Pedersen

    I’ve been avidly following this and it just makes me so damn sad. For the fish, for people on all sides of the Fukushima power plant, for the ecosystem. And you bring up a good point--radiation isn’t anything new. Unfortunately! Thanks for a thoughtful post!

Leave a Comment

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on topic. You represent that comments submitted do not infringe upon anyone's rights including copyright, trademark, privacy or other personal or proprietary rights.

We need to make sure you're a human and not a spambot. Please answer the following question. What is 1 - 17 equal to?

By submitting a comment here you grant us a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/website in attribution.